KEY POINTS |
---|
At the first antenatal visit, all pregnant women should be asked whether they or their partner have had genital herpes. |
There is a higher incidence of viraemia during primary herpes infection occurring during pregnancy than with herpes infection in non-pregnant individuals. Herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection should be considered in the differential diagnosis of an acutely unwell pregnant woman. |
Specialist obstetric and paediatric advice should be sought for a woman with active recurrent lesions at the time of delivery or a first episode of genital herpes that occurs in the third trimester. These situations are at high risk of maternal-fetal transmission of HSV, and delivery by Caesarean section is indicated. |
Women with a history of genital herpes who have not experienced any recurrences during pregnancy can be reassured that the risk of maternal-fetal transmission is extremely low (<0.04%);(1, 2) maternal antibodies are protective for the fetus/neonate. |
In the setting of a vaginal delivery for these women, scalp electrodes and instruments should not be used unless there is a clear indication because skin trauma may increase the risk of HSV transmission. |
Recurrent lesions at term are a relative (not absolute) indication for delivery by Caesarean section. The risk of maternal-fetal transmission from recurrent lesions during labour is low (1-3%), although risk may be greater with HSV-1 than HSV-2. Management options should be discussed with affected individuals antenatally. |
Antiviral medications, especially aciclovir, have been widely used in pregnancy without apparent adverse consequences. In general, pregnant women with genital herpes (in any trimester) should be offered the same treatment as non-pregnant people after a discussion regarding the relative benefits versus possible disadvantages. |
Suppressive antiviral therapy given from 36 weeks of gestation may reduce the chance of a recurrence at term, and therefore the need for delivery via Caesarean section. A higher frequency dosing regimen is recommended at this time because of the increased plasma volume in pregnancy. |
The use of antiviral medications and delivery by Caesarean section may not be completely protective against maternal-fetal transmission. |
All women should be given the same advice on postnatal surveillance of their baby/babies irrespective of whether antiviral treatment was given or the mode of delivery (see also the chapter on Neonatal HSV Infection). |
Most genital HSV infections (primary, non-primary or recurrent HSV-1 or HSV-2) are asymptomatic. i.e. most mothers of infants with neonatal HSV disease were previously unaware of their own infection before the baby's diagnosis. |
Scroll left to right to see content
Primary maternal genital herpes infection in early pregnancy may be associated with miscarriage,(3) and in the second and third trimesters might be associated with preterm delivery. In recurrent maternal HSV infection, the risk of intrauterine fetal infection is extremely low.(4) Furthermore, antenatal recurrent disease without HSV shedding at delivery is rarely associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. However, the presence of symptoms at delivery correlates relatively poorly with the detection of HSV from genital sites or lesions by HSV polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Assessment of viral shedding is based on clinical assessment.(5) If active recurrent genital herpes is present at delivery there is a 2% risk of maternal transmission. If active primary herpes present at delivery there is a high risk of maternal transmission (25–50%).
A nested case-control serology study assessing HSV-2 antibodies in stored serum samples from 283 women with a fetal loss after 20 weeks compared with 970 randomly selected women from a large source population found no association between HSV infection and fetal loss.(6) Data from a US cohort study found that untreated recurrent genital herpes infection may predispose to preterm delivery, but that this risk is eliminated by the use of suppressive antiviral treatment.(7)
Antiviral therapy is indicated for the treatment of primary and recurrent episodes of genital herpes during pregnancy (as for non-pregnant individuals) and for prophylaxis to reduce the risk of recurrence at the time of delivery. In the majority of situations, the benefits of antiviral therapy outweigh possible risks.
Aciclovir has been widely used in pregnancy. There is less experience with valaciclovir, but it is expected that this would be safe because valaciclovir is a prodrug of aciclovir. Consider the use of suppressive antiviral therapy from 36 weeks in women with multiple, recurrent, overt lesions or prior to 36 weeks if frequent symptomatic recurrences. It is recommended to use a higher frequency dosing regimen in late pregnancy because of the increased plasma volume in pregnancy. Commonly used regimens are as follows:
1. Oral antivirals
First episode preferred regimens:
Alternative regimens:
If the primary outbreak occurs in the first or second trimester, consider prescribing “backpocket” episodic medication for patients at the time of diagnosis (episodic treatment needs to be started very promptly to be effective).
Suggested “Back-pocket” episodic regimen and supply:
2. Intravenous antivirals
Intravenous (IV) aciclovir therapy can be considered for patients who have severe disease or complications that necessitate hospitalisation.(7)
Suppressive therapy in recurrent disease in pregnant women before 36 weeks gestation:
Preferred regimens:
If recurrences not well controlled on this regime then consider changing to:
Alternative regimens:
If recurrences not well controlled on this regime then consider changing to:
Note:
In the second and early third trimesters of pregnancy valaciclovir 500mg twice daily OR aciclovir 400 mg 3 times daily should be considered because of increased plasma volume, but see below for continuous suppression from 36 weeks’ gestation.
Continuous suppression in pregnant women from 36 weeks of gestation:
Key evidence relating to the use of antivirals in pregnancy is summarised below.
There are no randomised controlled trial data to guide the optimal delivery management for pregnant women with genital herpes. In those with primary infection late in pregnancy or at the time of delivery, Caesarean section significantly reduces vertical transmission in women with primary infection,(2) but infection has occurred in the presence of intact membranes. Prolonged contact with infected secretions may further reduce the benefits of Caesarean delivery.(21) The benefit of Caesarean delivery in women who have recurrent episodes at the time of labour is debatable because the risk of vertical transmission in recurrent disease is low.
No definitive studies have investigated the relationship between the duration of rupture of membranes (ROM) in the presence of clinical lesions and HSV transmission to the fetus. Caesarean section is still recommended if ROM has already occurred, and genital lesions are present. Data from 50 years ago suggesting reduced benefit if ROM >4 hours is not high quality.(22)
Key evidence relating to the impact of mode of delivery on maternal-fetal HSV transmission is summarised below.
Overall, there is a lack of robust evidence to inform the management of women who have recurrent genital herpes lesions at the onset of labour. Delivery by Caesarean section has traditionally been an option, but discussion about the relative risks of vaginal versus Caesarean delivery should ideally take place during the antenatal period. Because the risk of transmission during recurrent infection is low (1–3%) some women may opt for a vaginal delivery. Factors such as prematurity, infection with HSV-1 rather than HSV-2, and an expected long labour may increase the risk of maternal-fetal HSV transmission, and should be taken into account in discussions about the most appropriate strategy for each individual.
Disseminated HSV infection after genital or oro-labial infection is rare, but may be life-threatening. The diagnosis of disseminated HSV disease should be considered in any unwell patient presenting with signs and symptoms of infection during pregnancy. Viraemia during primary infection in a pregnant individual may result in multi-organ involvement with significant morbidity and mortality.(26, 27) Hospital admission and the use of intravenous aciclovir are required.
There is a lack of data regarding the management of preterm prelabour rupture of membranes in individuals with a primary HSV infection. Multidisciplinary discussion is required and the gestational stage needs to be taken into account. Treatment with intravenous aciclovir 5 mg/kg every 8 hours should be administered before delivery. Caesarean section is considered to be beneficial despite prolonged rupture of membranes, although the benefit of this approach might be reduced by prolonged contact with infected maternal secretions.(21) Corticosteroids are not contraindicated.(22)
One study showed that expectant management of 29 women with preterm premature rupture of membranes at <31 weeks’ gestation who had active recurrent genital herpes was not associated with neonatal transmission of HSV.(28) It was concluded that the risks of prematurity outweighed the risks of HSV transmission during a recurrent episode. The mean duration of membrane rupture was 13.2 days (range 1–35 days), 45% of infants were delivered by Caesarean section, and 8% of women had received antiviral therapy for control of symptoms.(28)
At the first antenatal visit, all pregnant women should be asked whether they or their partner have had genital herpes. In one US study, 22% of the 3192 pregnant couples enrolled were at risk for HSV-1 or HSV-2 infection.(5) The only independent risk factor for HSV-1 infection was having a partner with oral herpes, and this accounted for 75% of incident HSV-1 infections. Of 125 women susceptible to HSV-2 infection, 14% acquired HSV-2 infection during pregnancy. Most newly acquired infections were subclinical. The risk of becoming infected with HSV was eight times greater in relationships of ≤1 versus >1 year.(5)
Although there are no clear evidence-based guidelines to support clinical decision-making for the management of pregnant women with a partner who has a history of herpes infection, the following actions are recommended on theoretical grounds (GRADE C):
Relevant treatment algorithms are shown in Figures 4, 5, and 6. The first clinical episode may not be due to a primary infection because previous infection may not have been recognised/diagnosed. PCR (genital swab) and HSV type specific IgG serological testing in conjunction with clinical evaluation will help to identify whether HSV in pregnancy is a primary infection. A primary first episode is determined by being seronegative for HSV-1 and HSV-2 in the blood but the PCR swab testing HSV positive. Testing results should be discussed with an expert who understands the sensitivity and specificity of available testing methods. For any HSV infection during pregnancy, it is important to note that no intervention is completely protective against maternal-fetal transmission. Therefore, all women with a history of genital herpes should be given information about neonatal surveillance.
The Ministry of Health supports the use of these clinical guidelines, developed by clinical experts and professional associations to guide clinical care.
Produced by the Professional Advisory Board (PAG) of the Sexually Transmitted Infections Education Foundation
Sexually Transmitted Infections Education Foundation
Website by Original Image